Nber Working Paper Series When Are Analyst Recommendation Changes Influential?
نویسندگان
چکیده
Not all stock recommendation changes are equal. In a sample constructed to minimize the impact of confounding news, relatively few analyst recommendation changes are influential in the sense that they impact investors’ beliefs about a firm in a way that could be noticed in that firm’s stock returns. More than one-third of the stock-price reactions to analyst recommendation changes have the wrong sign and only approximately 10% have significant stock-price reactions at the 5% level using an extended market model. We find that the probability of an influential recommendation is higher for leader analysts, star analysts, away-from-consensus revisions, revisions issued contemporaneously with earnings forecasts, analysts with greater relative experience, and those with more accurate earnings estimates. Growth firms, small firms, high institutional ownership firms, and high prior turnover firms are also more likely to have influential stock recommendations. Strikingly, analyst recommendations are more likely to be influential after Reg FD and the settlement. Finally, influential recommendations are associated with increases in stock volatility and large absolute changes in consensus earnings forecasts. Roger K. Loh Singapore Management University Lee Kong Chian School of Business 50 Stamford Rd, #04-01 Singapore 178899 Singapore [email protected] René M. Stulz The Ohio State University Fisher College of Business 806A Fisher Hall 2100 Neil Avenue Columbus, OH 43210-1144 and NBER [email protected]
منابع مشابه
Nber Working Paper Series Conditional Cash Penalties in Education: Evidence from the Learnfare Experiment
Wisconsin’s influential Learnfare initiative is a conditional cash penalty program that sanctions a family’s welfare grant when covered teens fail to meet school attendance targets. In the presence of reference-dependent preferences, Learnfare provides uniquely powerful financial incentives for student performance. However, a 10-county random-assignment evaluation suggested that Learnfare had n...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Winning by Losing: Evidence on the Long-run Effects of Mergers
at the AFA and EFA for valuable comments. We thank Zach Liscow for excellent research assistance. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Direc...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Neoclassical Theory versus Prospect Theory: Evidence from the Marketplace
Neoclassical theory postulates that preferences between two goods are independent of the consumer’s current entitlements. Several experimental studies have recently provided strong evidence that this basic independence assumption, which is used in most theoretical and applied economic models to assess the operation of markets, is rarely appropriate. These results, which clearly contradict close...
متن کاملHealth Care
WWW.NBER.ORG Our web site features a searchable index to over 5000 NBER Working Papers issued since 1978. It also includes searchable indexes to all NBER books and to all current NBER Research Associates and Faculty Research Fellows. In addition, our web site has the NBER Macroeconomic History Database (3500 different time series), the Penn-World Tables of country data, and other items. *Garber...
متن کاملNber Working Paper Series Relative Goods' Prices and Pure Inflation
This paper uses a dynamic factor model for the quarterly changes in consumption goods' prices to separate them into three components: idiosyncratic relative-price changes, aggregate relative-price changes, and changes in the unit of account. The model identifies a measure of "pure" inflation: the common component in goods' inflation rates that has an equiproportional effect on all prices and is...
متن کامل